|Water Science and Engineering 2017, 10(3) 209-216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2017.09.002 ISSN: 1674-2370 CN: 32-1785/TV|
|Current Issue | Archive | Search [Print] [Close]|
Application of SWAT99.2 to sensitivity analysis of water balance components in unique plots in a hilly region
Jun-feng Dai a, b, c, *, Jia-zhou Chen b, Guo-an Lü b, Larry C. Brown d, Lei Gan a, c, Qin-xue Xu a, c
a College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
Although many sensitivity analyses using the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) in a complex watershed have been conducted, little attention has been paid to the application potential of the model in unique plots. In addition, sensitivity analysis of percolation and evapotranspiration with SWAT has seldom been undertaken. In this study, SWAT99.2 was calibrated to simulate water balance components for unique plots in Southern China from 2000 to 2001, which included surface runoff, percolation, and evapotranspiration. Twenty-one parameters classified into four categories, including meteorological conditions, topographical characteristics, soil properties, and vegetation attributes, were used for sensitivity analysis through one-at-a-time (OAT) sampling to identify the factor that contributed most to the variance in water balance components. The results were shown to be different for different plots, with parameter sensitivity indices and ranks varying for different water balance components. Water balance components in the broad-leaved forest and natural grass plots were most sensitive to meteorological conditions, less sensitive to vegetation attributes and soil properties, and least sensitive to topographical characteristics. Compared to those in the natural grass plot, water balance components in the broad-leaved forest plot demonstrated higher sensitivity to the maximum stomatal conductance (GSI) and maximum leaf area index (BLAI).
|Keywords： Forest and grass plots Water balance Sensitivity analysis Soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) One-at-a-time (OAT) method|
|Received 2016-07-10 Revised 2017-04-11 Online: 2017-07-30|
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 51569007 and 41301289), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province, China (Grant No. 2015GXNSFCA139004), the Fund of the IRCK by UNESCO (Grant No. KDL201601), and the Project of High Level Innovation Team and Outstanding Scholar in Guangxi Colleges and Universities (Grant No. 002401013001).
|Corresponding Authors: email@example.com (Jun-feng Dai)|
Ahmad, K., Gassman, P.W., Kanwar, R., 2002. Evaluation of the tile flow component of SWAT model under different management systems. In: Symposium of 2002 ASAE Annual Meeting, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.10416.
|1．Reza BARATI, Sajjad RAHIMI, Gholam Hossein AKBARI.Analysis of dynamic wave model for flood routing in natural rivers[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2012,5(3): 243-258|
|2．Wen-xian ZHANG*1, 2;Zhan-yu ZHANG2;Kang WANG3.Experimental study and simulations of infiltration in evapotranspiration landfill covers [J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2009,2(3): 96-109|
|3．Xu-ming WANG, Hai-jun LIU, Li-wei ZHANG, Rui-hao ZHANG.Climate change trend and its effects on reference evapotranspiration at Linhe Station, Hetao Irrigation District[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2014,7(3): 250-266|
|4．Li-juan XUE1,2, Li-jiao LI1, 3, Qi ZHANG*1.Hydrological behaviour and water balance analysis for Xitiaoxi catchment of Taihu Basin[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2008,1(3): 44-53|
|5．Yan-wei SUN; Xiao-mei WEI; Christine A. POMEROY.Global analysis of sensitivity of bioretention cell design elements to hydrologic performance[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2011,4(3): 246-257|
|6． Shou-ke WEI.Estimating water deficit and its uncertainties in water-scarce area using integrated modeling approach[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2012,5(4): 450-463|
|7．Xiao-meng SONG, Fan-zhe KONG, Che-sheng ZHAN Ji-wei HAN, Xin-hua ZHANG.Parameter identification and global sensitivity analysis of Xinanjiang model using meta-modeling approach[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2013,6(1): 1-17|
|8．Xin CAI; Ying-li WU; Jian-gang YI; Yu MING.Research on shape optimization of CSG dams[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2011,4(4): 445-454|
|9．Maziar Gholami Korzani, Sergio A. Galindo-Torres, Alexander Scheuermann, David J.Parametric study on smoothed particle hydrodynamics for accurate determination of drag coefficient for a circular cylinder[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2017,10(2): 143-153|
|Copyright by Water Science and Engineering|